Centralized vs Distributed AV
Compare centralized and distributed AV architecture approaches.
AV system architecture can be centralized (shared infrastructure) or distributed (per-room systems). This comparison helps you choose the right approach and understand how voice control works with each.
Centralized AV
Strengths
- Shared infrastructure efficiency
- Central management
- Easier maintenance
- Resource pooling
Limitations
- Single point of failure risk
- Higher upfront cost
- Complex network requirements
Best For
Large campuses, venues with many similar rooms
Distributed AV
Strengths
- Room independence
- Simpler networking
- Easier phased deployment
- Lower initial cost per room
Limitations
- Per-room management overhead
- Inconsistent configurations
- Higher long-term maintenance
Best For
Diverse room types, phased deployments, smaller installations
Our Verdict
Most organizations use a hybrid approach: centralized infrastructure for core signal distribution with local control intelligence in each room. This balances efficiency with reliability.
AV Engine Advantage
AV Engine works with both architectures, providing consistent voice control whether your systems are centralized, distributed, or hybrid.
Schedule a Demo
See how AV Engine integrates with your infrastructure. We'll show you real results from organizations like yours.