Platform Comparison

Q-SYS vs Crestron

Compare Q-SYS and Crestron control systems for commercial AV.

Q-SYS and Crestron are leading commercial AV control platforms. This comparison helps integrators and end users understand the differences and how voice control works with each.

Q-SYS

Strengths

  • Software-based licensing model
  • Strong audio DSP heritage
  • Growing video capabilities
  • Open ecosystem approach
  • Unified design environment

Limitations

  • Newer to control systems market
  • Video switching evolving
  • Smaller traditional programmer base

Best For

Audio-focused installations, software-centric organizations

Crestron

Strengths

  • Extensive product ecosystem
  • Decades of control system experience
  • Large programmer community
  • Comprehensive enterprise tools
  • Strong video switching heritage

Limitations

  • Higher hardware costs
  • Complex licensing
  • Steeper learning curve

Best For

Enterprise deployments, complex video routing, existing Crestron infrastructure

Our Verdict

Both platforms are excellent choices for commercial AV. Q-SYS offers advantages in audio-heavy applications and software-based scaling, while Crestron provides unmatched depth in enterprise control and video switching.

AV Engine Advantage

AV Engine integrates natively with both Q-SYS (via ECP) and Crestron (via CIP), providing consistent voice control regardless of which platform you choose.

Schedule a Demo

See how AV Engine integrates with your infrastructure. We'll show you real results from organizations like yours.

Free consultation • No commitment • ROI-focused discussion